The shared-desktop-ontologies mess

Alexander Neundorf neundorf at
Tue Dec 1 20:36:12 GMT 2009

On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 01.12.09 20:23:23, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > So, ok, with making it required ?
> Actually no - IMHO. Nepomuk is still marked optional in kdepim in most
> parts, so kdepim needs to adjust their buildsystem to really make it
> optional. Then they can propose making nepomuk and SDO a requirement for
> KDE 4.5. Its far to late in the cycle to change dependencies every other
> day.

Well, one could argue that soprano and SDO actually _are_ already hard 
dependencies. If you don't have it, parts of KDE (at least kdepim) don't 

Or let's phrase it different: do we want nepomuk to be an optional part of 
kdelibs or should it always be there ?


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list