Review Request: Allow the use of KModifierKeyInfo in contexts without KApplication

[David Faure]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/930/#review2094
-----------------------------------------------------------


No experience with such filters so I can't really review it. I only noticed that the iterators should be const_iterators since they don't modify the list (and then use constBegin/constEnd).

Also, if KModifierKeyInfoProvider are often create/destructed, the list could be a qset to speed up the removeAll(this).

- David


On 2009-08-10 12:11:30, Michael Leupold wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/930/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2009-08-10 12:11:30)
> 
> 
> Review request for kdelibs.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Currently KModifierKeyInfo needs a KApplication to install the event filter and dumps a warning if it isn't available. This patch makes it possible to use it in QApplication-only apps (eg. kdm) by installing the event filter using QAbstractEventDispatcher.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kdeui/util/kmodifierkeyinfoprovider_p.h 1008830 
>   /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kdeui/util/kmodifierkeyinfoprovider_x11.cpp 1008830 
> 
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/930/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael
> 
>