RFC v2: adding a temporary, non-BC gauranteed, 'private' library

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Tuesday 28 April 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> I've wondered, why is it you want to port every single application to
> use it *now* instead of testing that everything is as you want it to be,
> including the abi and api, with a targetted set of applications, maybe
> limited to a module or two ?

i don't think we'll end up porting every single application, and certainly 
nothing outside of the main modules that make up the KDE software distribution 
releases, but we'd like to port a good number of them otherwise it's pretty 
well impossible to get good testing of it, don't you think?

beyond that, we also feel, with good justification, that the new system also 
provide a better user experience, so spreading it around isn't a bad thing.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090428/442df27b/attachment.sig>