kdereview exemption for PolicyKit-KDE

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Sunday 16 November 2008, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Sunday 16 November 2008 03:28:26 Trever Fischer wrote:
> > Hi, I'm Trever, one of the 4 or so of us working on PolicyKit-KDE. For
> > the most part, it is as feature-complete as we planned for the 4.2
> > release, but it is still in playground. We'd like to request an exemption
> > to the normal kdereview period in order to get it in before the hard
> > feature freeze. Would this be possible?
>
> I'm honestly not hot on this in particular because it might become a very
> central part of our frameworks. I'd be more relaxed for something less
> critical.

is this default conservativism, or do you have actual issues with this code 
that people should be aware of?

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20081116/1009ebe1/attachment.sig>