kwallet and QCA

[nf2]

Maksim Orlovich wrote:
>> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>>     
>>> On Tuesday 03 June 2008, Maksim Orlovich wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Sharing the file format would be sufficient.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> along with he implied shared location and locking mechanism, you're
>>> quite
>>> right: that would be sufficient indeed.
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> The word "sufficient" somehow suggests that this would be the easier and
>> more realistic approach. I'm afraid it's not. It makes the whole system
>> more complex, takes ages to formulate
>>     
>
> Since when is taking the time to think a disadvantage?
>   

Generally it isn't, but i guess in this particular case i doubt that 
anyone has the drive to work this out *and* write two implementations. 
Do you?

> And how is involving glib and stuff like that NOT making /our/ system more
> complex?
>   

Oh well... Things in this - call it "application infrastructure" or 
"platform layer" - can only be written in GLib+C, as Qt doesn't fit 
there for various reasons (which i am tired discussing).

Norbert