Consensus on the kdelibs coding style

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Thursday 10 July 2008, Richard Moore wrote:
> On 7/10/08, Cristian Tibirna <tibirna at kde.org> wrote:
> > I actually agree with (and think like) Maksim.
>
> I'm pissed off that I'm even posting to this thread, let alone twice.
> The number of people who actually commit with any regularity to
> kdelibs is tiny  - why not just check the SVN stats and ask them? I

i actually have these stats in a postgres database. it contains the name of 
the contributor and how many commits since ~nov of 2006 they made to which 
relevant modules in kdelibs (core, ui, io, file, utils).

it's pretty interesting and revealing.

i'll be bringing numbers with me to akademy and advocating for a recognized 
(within the kde technology project) kdelibs maintainership so that kdelibs can 
be maintained just like kontact, okular, amarok, gwenview, etc are.

i don't think that thse topics are something we can sort out on this list in 
this fashion. in that sense i agree with thiago's last mail in this thread.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Trolltech

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20080710/0d2b43be/attachment.sig>