Should we switch from KDE_fseek to QT_FSEEK, etc. ? was: Re: [Kde-pim] kmail doesn't compile from trunk on Slackware GNU/Linux
thiago at kde.org
Thu Jan 24 16:17:29 GMT 2008
On Thursday 24 January 2008 15:04:25 Jarosław Staniek wrote:
> I guees you are compiling for 64 bits?
> Giovanni, KDE_fseek == fseek64 was a mistake and will be fixed - please
> replace that with QT_FSEEK or fseek locally in the kmail code.
> The problem is only discovered now because before nobody tried to use
> The question is whether we should switch to the following macros from
> (and making many of the KDE_* macros obsolete or just aliases)
> Note 1: that the KDE_* macros were added before Qt4.
> Note 2: the kde_file.h should still be accessible for C code.
Why are we using the low-level functions in the first place? Shouldn't the
code be using QFile?
Why do we even have C code?
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the kde-core-devel