Increasing Lib Versioning

[Matt Rogers]

On Jan 14, 2008, at 9:18 PM, Allen Winter wrote:

> On Monday 14 January 2008 15:24:03 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>> On Sunday 13 January 2008, Matt Rogers wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> If they don't use it, then perhaps it's for a reason. I'm against
>>> just going to change everything in trunk (or trunk/KDE even) to use
>>> the GENERIC versioning.
>>>
> I guess this means I should keep my hands off kopete??
> In any event, there are very very few cases where GENERIC versioning
> is not used. So far I only see okular, kopete, and gwenview.
> And Pino already told me he will maintain lib versioning in okular  
> himself.
>

Kopete and KDevelop. Kopete is because we'll be breaking the API for  
KDE 4.1 (most likely). We may adopt the generic lib versioning at  
that point though. KDevelop has tons of new libraries which, in the  
opinion of us kdevelop developers, don't deserve the generic lib  
version because, to us, it implies a maturity that they don't have yet.

>>> I am ok with bumping the version numbers though.
>>
> I'll bump the version numbers one of these Mondays.
> Nag me if I forget.

Will do. :) next Monday is a U.S. national holiday. sounds like the  
perfect time to me. :)
--
Matt


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20080114/49c2138c/attachment.sig>