KDynamicSetting new class proposal

[Rafael Fernández López]

Hi,

First of all Pino, thanks for having a look at the class :)

> > private:
> >     KDynamicSetting();
>
> Why so?

Nah, as we talked on IRC, I didn't know that if you did not specify the 
constructor on the public segment, no constructor was created... I thought 
gcc added a "null" one, but still being valid. Probably I mixed up with my 
java knowledge that I had to learn two years ago at uni... :)

> Not sure if it's really possible, but a minimum autotest for it? :)

Yes, why not. I will try to write a small test battery for this class before 
committing.

So I attach again the code if you guys want to review the cleaned version. Now 
it only contains the enums that I will use at the moment. On the previous 
example I added a few more to show how easy it is to add new.


Bye and thanks,
Rafael Fernández López

GPG Fingerprint: B9F4 4730 43F8 FFDD CC5E BA8E 724E 406E 3F01 D070
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kdynamicsetting.h
Type: text/x-c++hdr
Size: 2828 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20080212/f0014a88/attachment.h>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kdynamicsetting.cpp
Type: text/x-c++src
Size: 3578 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20080212/f0014a88/attachment.cpp>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20080212/f0014a88/attachment.sig>