kdereview exemption for PolicyKit-KDE

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Monday 08 December 2008, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Dario Freddi wrote:
> >If nobody is against this, I would like to move it to kdereview now so
> > that it can get more attention for anyone who wants to review it, since
> > it is now stable and whatever its destiny will be it does no longer
> > belong to playground. If I don't get any negative feedback I will move
> > it to kdereview by tomorrow.
>
> That's fine.
>
> But please remember that you can't move it to trunk/KDE until the freeze
> is lifted, in about a month.

Dirk had proposed that this go into kdereview and be included in beta2 if it 
passed muster there. is that still a go or is that no longer on the table?

(given that our downstreams will end up shipping it anyways, i hope that's 
still on the table.)

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20081210/d7d6eba4/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20081210/d7d6eba4/attachment.sig>