[RFC] KConfig API stuff

[Hans Meine]

Am Dienstag, 23. Oktober 2007 17:26:46 schrieb Andreas Hartmetz:
> undirty() is perfectly clear if you have ever heard of a dirty cache.
> For someone who doesn't know the terminology a long name is probably
> unavoidable. And it won't really hurt either because it's rarely used...
> Huh, I wonder why the functionality is needed at all.
>
> I am not saying anything for or against changing this at all.

IMHO markClean() works better for people not familiar with the term "dirty"..
(yes, this is my last contribution to this overly long thread.. ;-p )

Ciao, /  /
     /--/
    /  / ANS