KDE Print porting - help needed

[Kurt Pfeifle]

Hans Meine wrote:

>>> In fact, supporting a PDF workflow and supporting printing on non-unix is
>>> the whole reason we no longer use the postscript-only workflow.
>> Reading this sermon again and again starts making me furious.
>> Supporting a PDF workflow does not necessitate to un-support a
>> PostScript workflow.
> 
> Note that he wrote "no longer use the PS-*only* workflow", not "[totally] 
> *un-support* a PS workflow".

Thanks for the correction.

However, I wonder why then Albert's complaint occurs, who stated that
the outlined API will break okular's printing (which is based on out-
putting PostScript), and gets in turn adviced to use bitmapped-based
printing then?

-- 
Kurt Pfeifle
System & Network Printing Consultant ---- Linux/Unix/Windows/Samba/CUPS
Infotec Deutschland GmbH  .....................  Hedelfinger Strasse 58
A RICOH Company  ...........................  D-70327 Stuttgart/Germany