KDE Print porting - help needed

[Hans Meine]

On Samstag 13 Oktober 2007, Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
> Thomas Zander wrote:
> Let me re-state the facts how *I* understand them (I know, I repeat my-
> self, and I fear, I'll once more be ignored):

I don't think you're ignored; AFAICS, your experience with printing is very 
welcome.  At least, I carefully read your emails and enjoyed many bits of 
information that were new to me.

> > In fact, supporting a PDF workflow and supporting printing on non-unix is
> > the whole reason we no longer use the postscript-only workflow.
>
> Reading this sermon again and again starts making me furious.
> Supporting a PDF workflow does not necessitate to un-support a
> PostScript workflow.

Note that he wrote "no longer use the PS-*only* workflow", not "[totally] 
*un-support* a PS workflow".

-- 
Ciao, /  /                                                    .o.
     /--/                                                     ..o
    /  / ANS                                                  ooo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20071013/f03494ef/attachment.sig>