[Fwd: Re: kdebuildsycoca does not work]

[Christian Ehrlicher]

David Faure schrieb:
> On Sunday 07 October 2007, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we've those problems with kbuildsycoca since last night:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07.10.07 13:12:21, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I get an assert in kstandarddirs.cpp:642:
>>> Q_ASSERT(prefix != "/");
> This was hit when my entire hard disk was listed recursively by kbuildsycoca4,
> due to a local mistake where I didn't define APPLNK_INSTALL_DIR anymore.
> So I added the assert so that whatever happens, kstandarddirs never ends up
> listing "/" recursively, this can't be good, ever.
> 
> I am completely lost as to why you should hit this on Windows.
> kernel/kstandarddirs_win.cpp doesn't look like it could ever return "/"...
> 
>>> It worked yesterday morning.
>> David Faure added that line, I suggest to talk to him about that and its
>> impact on win32. I guess we'd need something like QDir::rootDir()
>> instead of "/".
> Well, if you hit the assert then you have a resource pointing to "/", *that* should be fixed IMHO, not the assert itself.
> 
> Anyone checked the backtrace of this assert to find out which resource is wrongly defined?
> 
It comes from kbuildsycoca.cpp:379:

KServiceGroup::Ptr entry = g_bsgf->addNew("/", kdeMenu->directoryFile, 
KServiceGroup::Ptr(), false);


Christian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20071007/9b4e6b03/attachment.sig>