kdesupport/soprano/includes

[Christian Ehrlicher]

Sebastian Trüg schrieb:
> On Friday 05 October 2007 18:35:16 Rafael Fernández López wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is crazy ! the thread splitted in different lists...
>>
>> El Friday 05 October 2007 17:43:59 Christian Ehrlicher escribió:
>>> Jarosław Staniek schrieb:
>>>> Rafael Fernández López said the following, On 2007-10-05 15:47:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Right. At the moment on include folder I have soprano and Soprano
>>>>> folders installed. This will fail on windows... at least I think so...
>>>>>
>>>>> Any input from windows systems ?
>>>> How about libsoprano/ ?
>> Sebastian ? What do you think ?
> 
> I think it is a little ugly.
> 
>>> I still don't understand why you need include/soprano (file) at all -
>>> either you use a subdir and put *all* your files into your you don't...
>> Sebastian ? ^^
> 
> I don't get it. I use a subdir with all files in it. The problem is that I 
> have two subdirs: one with the standard includes such as "statement.h" and 
> one with the "nice" includes such as "Statement". Once is called "soprano" 
> and the other one "Soprano". That is the problem since Windows apparently 
> still does not take case into account in file management.
> Maybe one solution would be to add yet another folder layer and add it to the 
> include path in FindSoprano.cmake:
>        soprano/niceincludes/Soprano
> or something like that.
> 
> Or we just plain remove the nice includes. :(

Ok, now I understand - I thought one of them is a file.
Then I prefer soprano and soprano-devel (or whatever those files are for)


Christian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20071005/70c890e2/attachment.sig>