Back to kDebug

[Thomas Zander]

On Friday 25 May 2007 18:50:53 Lubos Lunak wrote:
>  this should be a follow-up to
> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=116903044203449&w=2 . I'd like
> to do something about it before it gets forgotten even more.

On this topic;
I was one of the few people in that thread that had some doubts about 
having it behave more like qDebug. Over the weeks I noted that any and 
all objections of mine were based on old experience and misconceptions. I 
now really want to have the 'endl' part be optional and space adding 
around types be added.

So, can't we simply extend qdebug to know about sections?

Cheers!
-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070525/63f20d7c/attachment.sig>