Back to kDebug

Thomas Zander zander at
Fri May 25 21:46:36 BST 2007

On Friday 25 May 2007 18:50:53 Lubos Lunak wrote:
>  this should be a follow-up to
> . I'd like
> to do something about it before it gets forgotten even more.

On this topic;
I was one of the few people in that thread that had some doubts about 
having it behave more like qDebug. Over the weeks I noted that any and 
all objections of mine were based on old experience and misconceptions. I 
now really want to have the 'endl' part be optional and space adding 
around types be added.

So, can't we simply extend qdebug to know about sections?

Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list