an additional requirement on kdelibs

[Brad Hards]

On Friday 16 March 2007 20:22, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 16 March 2007, Brad Hards wrote:
> > On Monday 12 March 2007 08:31, Jos van den Oever wrote:
> > > This week I have quite a bit of time in the evenings to work on fixing
> > > the issues that will certainly arise because of this merge and next
> > > week too, so this seems like a good time to do so.
> > >
> > > If you have questions or objections, now is your time to speak.
> >
> > Please make the dependency optional.
> >
> > I know you think Strigi is important, but it is not so important that it
> > can justify breaking kdelibs.
>
> Well kdelibs isn't broken anymore; or what do you mean exactly?
Each time I go to recompile kdelibs (or other random module), I get complaints 
about not having a recent enough strigi. I just want to get on with coding, 
and strigi isn't so core that a whole module should refuse to compile if it 
isn't available.

Brad
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070316/ecc0d128/attachment.sig>