pid_t or Q_PID?

[Thiago Macieira]

Oswald Buddenhagen said:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:25:22PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> Oswald Buddenhagen said:
>> > fwiw, this is another case where i definitely would prefer an inline
>> > function - there is just no point in not inlining it.
>>
>> And include the Windows header that defines the structure containing
>> dwProcessId in the kprocess.h header? No way.
>>
> not that windows.h wouldn't be implicitly included about everywhere,
> but theoretically you've got a point here. bad example, i guess. :)
> i assume that you agree with the remaining points.

I do. I realised I forgot to write that after I had pressed Send.

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358