pid_t or Q_PID?

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:25:22PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Oswald Buddenhagen said:
> > fwiw, this is another case where i definitely would prefer an inline
> > function - there is just no point in not inlining it.
> 
> And include the Windows header that defines the structure containing
> dwProcessId in the kprocess.h header? No way.
> 
not that windows.h wouldn't be implicitly included about everywhere,
but theoretically you've got a point here. bad example, i guess. :)
i assume that you agree with the remaining points.

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.