QProcess vs K3Process

Oswald Buddenhagen ossi at kde.org
Thu Jun 7 00:39:20 BST 2007


On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:28:23AM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 06.06.07 23:31:55, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 10:52:37PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > Well, we'll just have to have one of the Windows guys fix it.
> > > 
> > obviously. i'd prefer it if one of them would speak up now, though.
> > oh, well, they'll notice when it says "error: ...". :)
> 
> I've been following and one thing that crossed my mind is: Do we even
> support win9X? Does Qt4 even support that platform officialy (I think
> no, but am not sure)?
>
qglobal gives no indication it would not. some non-use of new api in
QProcess indicates that win9x is actively supported.

> I'm not sure I understood the original problem, so I can't say or test
> what would happen with cmd.exe.  Can you give a short example?
> 
try that:
command /c dir | more
command /c dir c:\ | more
command /c dir "c:"\ | more
command /c dir "c:\\" | more
command /c "dir | more"
commadn /c "dir \"c:\"\ | more"
and whatever else comes to mind. and the same with cmd, of course.

don't try this at the command line - the unquoted variants will be
interpreted differently than planned, obviously. use CreateProcess
programmatically.

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.




More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list