changing KGraphicsUtils? (update/current state of the discussion)

[Matthew Woehlke]

re: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.core/42774>

Here is the response I have seen so far:

- Thomas is against mix(). Andreas, Michael and Hans are in favor. David 
stated that he believes the consensus favors mix(), although that of 
course isn't very concrete :-). If this doesn't change over the weekend, 
mix() will go in on Monday.

- I haven't heard anything clear/strong on renaming blendColors() to 
overlayColors() (or am forgetting, in which case I apologize). Michael 
noted "the names seem fine to me, I suspect the API documentation will 
be more important" which I am interpreting as indifference (meaning he 
is ok with either outcome). Pending further discussion, this will also 
go in Monday.

- I'm still in favor of KColorUtils; I like that it separates this from 
kdefx and I think it's more specific. Matthias noted that KColorUtils is 
perhaps more discoverable. Thomas is opposed. Michael I think is opposed 
but I am not sure :-). Hans is of the opinion that there should not be 
functions taking pixmaps as inputs, which might be taken to argue for 
KColorUtils. Pending further discussion, I will probably go with 
KColorUtils, but please do not take that to mean I am not listening to 
further comments.

I apologize if any of the above is in error (please correct me! :-) ).

-- 
Matthew
"943. I am not Bjorn of Borg."
  -- from 975 things Mr. Welch can no longer do in an RPG
http://theglen.livejournal.com/16735.html