KConfig + KComponentData (Re: KInstance redesign)

[Matthias Kretz]

On Tuesday 23 January 2007 21:02, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> setGroup? Has this method (with its nasty side-effect) not been
> obsoleted already long ago by KConfigGroup?

not in practice. In theory you should use KConfigGroup exclusively.

I guess most of the considerations when talking about changes in KConfig are 
about porting efforts. If porting was effortless I'd be a lot more radical 
and get rid of setGroup as well as KConfig in favor of KSharedConfig (which 
would also get value based and not use KSharedPtr externally but internally 
and then renamed to KConfig).

-- 
________________________________________________________
Matthias Kretz (Germany)                            <><
http://Vir.homelinux.org/
MatthiasKretz at gmx.net, kretz at kde.org,
Matthias.Kretz at urz.uni-heidelberg.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070124/4be08fc6/attachment.sig>