QtScript
    Boudewijn Rempt 
    boud at valdyas.org
       
    Tue Feb  6 08:27:34 GMT 2007
    
    
  
On Monday 05 February 2007, Richard Moore wrote:
> Yes, Kross is just a way of instantiating engines - it's pretty
> trivial. The real effort is in bindings etc. which kross leaves to the
> engines (including KJSEmbed, QtScript, PyQt, QtRuby etc). Kross is
> just a little bit of glue.
You don't have to create separate bindings to your application objects for 
each supported language with Kross. Which means does save the effort to make 
separate bindings for every language you want to support. And then there's 
the extra's around it, like the script manager.
So it may be trivial, but it's not just a little bit of glue.
-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070206/57b0ef4d/attachment.sig>
    
    
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list