QtScript
Boudewijn Rempt
boud at valdyas.org
Tue Feb 6 08:27:34 GMT 2007
On Monday 05 February 2007, Richard Moore wrote:
> Yes, Kross is just a way of instantiating engines - it's pretty
> trivial. The real effort is in bindings etc. which kross leaves to the
> engines (including KJSEmbed, QtScript, PyQt, QtRuby etc). Kross is
> just a little bit of glue.
You don't have to create separate bindings to your application objects for
each supported language with Kross. Which means does save the effort to make
separate bindings for every language you want to support. And then there's
the extra's around it, like the script manager.
So it may be trivial, but it's not just a little bit of glue.
--
Boudewijn Rempt
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070206/57b0ef4d/attachment.sig>
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list