Naming of blitz ?

[Sune Vuorela]

On 2007-08-24, Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Mosfet wrote:
>> Yes, I think we can change the header and library to "qimageblitz" if that 
>> will solve the problem for you. 
>
> Anything wrong with just 'qblitz' (or 'blitzfx')? :-)
>
> Also, it is only the .so name that needs to change? (Maybe the headers 
> also, but i.e. not what we call it to users?)

>From my point of view, it doesn't matter what it is called from a user
perspective, I mostly care about the name from a technical perspective -
to avoid clashes with something existing.

qblitz, blitzfx, qimageblitz and many other things fits this nicely, it
looks like.

/Sune