Extended debug

[Andreas Pakulat]

On 14.08.07 13:27:22, Josef Spillner wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 August 2007 11:50:11 Thomas Zander wrote:
> > It would be great if after this thread comes up with a good default we can
> > steal some ideas from log4j and allow people that work on just one or 2
> > classes to see only their debug like the old stuff did.  I.e. be
> > configurable in some way.
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/qmmslog seems to be unmaintained but might 
> still be a useful resource.
> 
> In general one might also investigate the idea of using log4j directly in 
> debug builds. Using GCJ, you can create C++ headers for Java libraries and 
> use the natively compiled version (log4j.x.x.x.jar.so) so the only overhead 
> would be a tiny variant of a VM running. I've made good experience with this 
> mechanism as it saves a lot of maintenance work for reimplementations, but 
> there are also certain issues such as dlopen() aka plugged-in XML parsers, 
> for instance.

And the problem of using other compilers than gcj, for examples msvc.
(does mingw support that even?)

Andreas

-- 
Your reasoning powers are good, and you are a fairly good planner.