kdebug

[Stephan Kulow]

Am Friday 03 August 2007 schrieb Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper:
> On Thursday 02 August 2007, Flavio Castelli wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 August 2007 16:13:35 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> > > On Thursday 02 August 2007 15:17, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > > One final thing: I've been toying with the idea of an "extended debug
> > > > output", which will print the program's name, PID, the function name,
> > > > source file and line number. That would make k_funcinfo unnecessary,
> > > > since all of that information is already included.
> > >
> > > Yes, please.
> >
> > +1
> > It would be cool to have something like log4j / log4cxx
>
> +1  Would be a HUGE help if we had something as flexible as log4j which
> would allow debugging information to be had without requiring our users to
> recompile the entirety of our programs.  Is this not possible?  I can't
> count how many times I've had people stop trying to help me help them debug
> a problem just because they wouldn't/couldn't recompile code from source. 
> Very frustrating, and much less valuable than log4* where logging levels
> can be tuned at run-time, not compile time...
It's a design decision to compile out kDebug in released code.

Greetings, Stephan