Fwd: KFileMetaInfo API changes proposal from Strigi

[Jos van den Oever]

--- Original Message ---
Date: 4/29/2007
From: "Evgeny Egorochkin" <phreedom.stdin at gmail.com>
Subject: KFileMetaInfo API changes proposal from Strigi


ee.patch is a cumulative KFileMetaInfo and related API changes proposal
which
is based on vdo.patch by Jos van den Oever

There's one unsettled issue:
Jos proposed to make all KFileMetaInfo constructors private besides the
default one and use MetaInfoJob to set up KFileMetaInfo. Is this
reasonable?

Regards, Evgeny
-------------- next part --------------
ee.patch is a cumulative KFileMetaInfo and related API changes proposal which
is based on vdo.patch by Jos van den Oever

There's one unsettled issue:
Jos proposed to make all KFileMetaInfo constructors private besides the
default one and use MetaInfoJob to set up KFileMetaInfo. Is this reasonable?

Regards, Evgeny
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ee.patch.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 4211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070429/d133943e/attachment.zip>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vdo.patch.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 2535 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070429/d133943e/attachment-0001.zip>