Summary: Re: Drop KAssistantDialog in favor of QDialog

[Daniel Molkentin]

Hi!

So what's the conclusion now? I think given the current state of 
KAssitantDialog it's better to use QWizard and maybe ask the trolls to open 
the Wizard Style in the long term to implement our "KDE style".

Note: the use of the QWizard does NOT keep us from using the name "assistant" 
instead of "wizard".

Cheers,
  Daniel

Am Sonntag 15 April 2007 schrieb Matthias Lechner:
> On Friday 13 April 2007 21:09:38 Alexander Dymo wrote:
> > On 4/11/07, Jaroslaw Staniek <js at iidea.pl> wrote:
> > > I would say:
> > > Yes, let's keep KAssistantDialog outside of the public API before KDE
> > > 4.1. Then, chances are that some apps will make use of its features
> > > (not even planned in new QWizard), like "List of steps" [1].
> >
> > Well, if it's outside the public API, how would apps use it? ;)
> > Btw, is that "list of steps" features already implemented? If yes, you
> > have me as a loyal KAssistantDialog user immediatelly ;)
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> I implemented this feature last year but it was decided that it would be
> better to have such a list on the left and not on the top since horizontal
> space is expensive.
>
> But I am still willing to implement this feature with the new requirements
> as soon as I find the time and motivation ;o)
>
> Best regards
> Matthias


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070419/29309e64/attachment.sig>