FW: [REMINDER] Upcoming KDE 4.0 Milestones + Nepomuk

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Monday 09 April 2007, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> Please notice that nepomuk did not work on win32 some weeks ago - did
> not try since then due to other things to do. Is it possible to compile
> nepomuk as an optional module?

it is right now, yes. as more apps get support for it, however, it's going to 
become more and more of an issue. the worst thing is having lots of optional 
code that only a small number of people use because it's optional. that 
guarantees bugs and breakages, which will lead to nepomuk getting a poor 
reputation and used even less. that's really the opposite of what we should 
be aiming for.

if it doesn't build on win32, either make it not build on win32 or fix the 
build. afaik saprano builds on win32 at least, which it didn't previously.

also, there are several classes in there that are pure GUI classes and don't 
have an real nepomuk requirements.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

Full time KDE developer sponsored by Trolltech (http://www.trolltech.com)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070409/e36777d3/attachment.sig>