D-BUS required changes in KDE 4

[Thiago Macieira]

johnflux at gmail.com wrote:
>Thiago,
>  What would be the harm in optimising this case?  Even if you doubt
>its use, but there's no disadvantage, why not optimise it anyway to
>keep everyone happy?

Because without hard data indicating what to optimise, I won't do 
anything. Optimising without knowing *what* could make things worse. Give 
me a test case that I can cachegrind and we'll talk.

>  If you don't want to spend the time on it, would you reject a patch
>from someone else?

That's not up to me. The maintainer is Marius Bugge Monsen.

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060915/ffaf2f2d/attachment.sig>