Features for the new bugzilla?
nicolasg at snafu.de
Sat Sep 9 22:01:59 BST 2006
On Saturday 09 September 2006 12:52, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:31:50AM +0200, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> > On Friday 08 September 2006 16:00, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > Philip Rodrigues wrote:
> > > >* Maybe some more possible statuses: perhaps some things that are more
> > > >specific and less combative than INVALID (NOTABUG and NOTKDE perhaps?)
> > >
> > > We could split INVALID into more specific resolutions, true. Those two
> > > seem like a good start.
> i suggested similar changes several times already. so far they were
> always shot down with the "we don't want to diverge from the upstream
> database scheme too much".
> > > I'd also like to see LATER and REMIND merged, since their distinction
> > > is really small. I generally use REMIND to mean that the reporter
> > > should remind us, while LATER to mean that it will happen on its own.
> > I am not sure.
> > LATER can really mean much later, compared to REMIND that can be used for
> > the next unfreeze (feature, documentation etc.)
> this just means that they mean exactly the same. for priority there is a
> separate field ...
For me it is not the same. A very low priority is something that I (as
developer of the application) will not do, LATER is for what I cannot do.
Sure, perhaps target/milestone could replace that, but that is not something
what the current KDE Bugs can do. Therefore it is perhaps another wish for
the new one.
Have a nice day!
More information about the kde-core-devel