Features for the new bugzilla?

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:31:50AM +0200, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> On Friday 08 September 2006 16:00, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Philip Rodrigues wrote:
> > >* Maybe some more possible statuses: perhaps some things that are more
> > >specific and less combative than INVALID (NOTABUG and NOTKDE perhaps?)
> >
> > We could split INVALID into more specific resolutions, true. Those two
> > seem like a good start.
> >
i suggested similar changes several times already. so far they were
always shot down with the "we don't want to diverge from the upstream
database scheme too much".

> > I'd also like to see LATER and REMIND merged, since their distinction is
> > really small. I generally use REMIND to mean that the reporter should
> > remind us, while LATER to mean that it will happen on its own.
> I am not sure.
> 
> LATER can really mean much later, compared to REMIND that can be used for the 
> next unfreeze (feature, documentation etc.)
> 
this just means that they mean exactly the same. for priority there is a
separate field ...

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.