Features for the new bugzilla?

[Robert Knight]

Hi,

> * Maybe some more possible statuses: perhaps some things that are more
> specific and less combative than INVALID (NOTABUG and NOTKDE perhaps?)

Unless I am mistaken, bugs.kde.org doesn't currently have a
"NEEDSINFO" status.  That would be useful as well.

Regards,
Robert.


On 08/09/06, Philip Rodrigues <philip.rodrigues at chch.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
> As I guess everyone knows, there's a new server for bugs.kde.org being
> prepared, with a newer version of bugzilla installed. This seems like a
> good opportunity to discuss what additional features or changes would be
> useful in the new bugzilla installation.
>
> From my point of view (bug triage), some useful things would be:
>
> * Stock responses à la GNOME, integrated into the bugzilla:
> http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/StockResponses
> These effectively make it easy to say "you did something wrong" in a nice
> way, with pointers to more help for the reporter (remember that bugzilla is
> a major point of contact between KDE developers and users, so we want to
> present ourselves as nice, cuddly people, right? ;-)
>
> * Maybe some more possible statuses: perhaps some things that are more
> specific and less combative than INVALID (NOTABUG and NOTKDE perhaps?)
>
> I'll leave it at that for now. Other ideas? Once we've got a reasonable idea
> of a set of useful features/changes, I'll try to produce a summary for the
> sysadmins.
>
> Regards,
> Philip
> --
> KDE Documentation Team: http://i18n.kde.org/doc
> KDE Documentation Online: http://docs.kde.org
>
>