KProcess bug or something wrong in kdevelop?

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 04:16:42PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On IRC/#kdevelop somebody pointed out that the problem might be using
> QProcess and KProcess inside the same unix process. Both classes install
> unix-signal handlers, but QProcess does this on every instance creation.
> KProcess only seems to do this when it is created first.
> 
might be. qprocess never was a good citizen regarding signal chaining in
qt3. it think it is better in qt4.

> The better solution IMHO is that KProcess installs the signal handlers
> everytime it is instantiated. 
> 
this wouldn't do any good.

> I guess its too late to get a fix into 3.5.6, thus I'll open a bugreport
> about this.
> 
wontfix, as far as i'm concerned.
in kde4, kprocess as it exists now will die anyway. provided the trolls
get their asses moving, so dropping kprocess won't cause serious feature
regressions.

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.