Concluding the discussion about splitting kdebase

[David Faure]

On Tuesday 16 May 2006 23:18, Jakob Petsovits wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16. May 2006 17:11, Frans Englich wrote:
> > > As it contains the essential run-time dependencies, what about calling it
> > > "runtime"?
> >
> > Wow, you are using your head. "kderuntime" sounds nice to me. I would
> > probably prefer "kde-runtime" but we don't call kdelibs kde-libs or kdebase
> > kde-base..
> 
> Well it would be kdebase/runtime, at least at the current state of the 
> discussion. No need to have the module naming scheme applied if it's
> just a subdirectory.

kdebase/runtime sounds fine to me.

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).