Concluding the discussion about splitting kdebase
jpetso at gmx.at
Tue May 16 22:18:24 BST 2006
On Tuesday, 16. May 2006 17:11, Frans Englich wrote:
> > As it contains the essential run-time dependencies, what about calling it
> > "runtime"?
> Wow, you are using your head. "kderuntime" sounds nice to me. I would
> probably prefer "kde-runtime" but we don't call kdelibs kde-libs or kdebase
Well it would be kdebase/runtime, at least at the current state of the
discussion. No need to have the module naming scheme applied if it's
just a subdirectory.
More information about the kde-core-devel