The Technical Working Group's mission statement

[Andras Mantia]

On Tuesday 14 March 2006 21:32, Jaison Lee wrote:
> > - I don't want that if an important decision - which affects KDE in
> > general - is made that kde-core-devel to be left out (at list
> > inform here and redirect to the discussion thread)
>
> OK. But at least please explain how what Thiago did just now is not
> acceptable. If you are only interested in results and no details,
> then having a major contributor come out and say "cmake kicked scons
> butt and I'm about to remove the SConstruct files entirely" should be
> sufficient info.

Assuming that there was a real TWG decision (which we know there wasn't) 
Thiago would have made the mistake that he throws a sentence that "it 
was decided that cmake was used". No backup when, where and who 
decided.

What he did wrong right now was that he presented his opinion in a way 
one could thought that was the TWG's opinion.

And if you look, I'm not the only one who questioned this statement.

Andras
-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060314/159cb92c/attachment.sig>