The Technical Working Group's mission statement
Andras Mantia
amantia at kde.org
Tue Mar 14 19:01:57 GMT 2006
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 20:58, Matt Rogers wrote:
> but kde-core-devel wasn't involved in the decision at all.
> kde-buildsystem is a public mailing list. where's the issue? we can
> be spamming kde-core-devel for every little thing. the buildsystem is
> its own beast and deserves its own mailing list.
But as it is something that affects the whole KDE, kde-core-devel should
be informed about the decision (not about the details of every build
system discussion).
> if you want to keep
> up, i suggest subscribing to the list.
No, because I'm not interested how the build system issues are solved,
but I'm interested to know when a decision is made and what were the
reasoning behind that decision.
Is it really hard to understand this? Anyway, move on now, this thread
is already too big.
Andras
--
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060314/82227aa2/attachment.sig>
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list