The Technical Working Group's mission statement

Christian Ehrlicher Ch.Ehrlicher at gmx.de
Tue Mar 14 16:57:29 GMT 2006


Andras Mantia schrieb:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 18:40, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> Again: this was no TWG decision. The TWG did not meet and decide
>> "it's cmake". *I* composed the email on my own and wrote that cmake
>> had been chosen because, from what I can see in kde-buildsystem, it
>> HAS been chosen.
> 
> Look, I'm sure it is a misunderstanding, but read again your mail. You 
> wrote that as a second mail in  "The Technical Working Group's mission 
> statement", so it can *easily* interpreted as a TWG decision.
> 
> I would be happy about a statement, like:
> I (Thiago) or the TWG wants to have cmake as the default build system, 
> because automake is like we know and scons seems to be unsupported now 
> and we want to go forward. Any objections?
> 
> And no, you don't have to do it now anymore, now everybody should be 
> aware of that it was not a TWG decision, but a decision you support and 
> would like to go that way if nobody objects.
> 
The decision is obviously when you take a look at kde-buildsystem. After
Thomas Nagy said that he has no time/ no internet connection to work on
scons and that the scons people are very uncooperative nearly all on
kde-buildsystem switched to cmake...

Christian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060314/bcdda8dc/attachment.sig>


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list