The Technical Working Group's mission statement

[Thiago Macieira]

Andras Mantia wrote:
>It's one thing that it's clear that scons was not supported while cmake
>was, but still a mail about this on kde-core-devel would be nice
>instead of simply stating "the choice has been made". No, I have no
>problem with cmake as I don't know it, just that the statement
>suggested that the TWG decided altough in the statues it says that
>decisions are reached on public mailing lists, namely kde-core-devel.

Again: this was no TWG decision. The TWG did not meet and decide "it's 
cmake". *I* composed the email on my own and wrote that cmake had been 
chosen because, from what I can see in kde-buildsystem, it HAS been 
chosen.

I'll repeat: the simple fact that cmake is the only alternative here, 
short of going back to autotools, means that cmake is the choice.

If it's a matter of decisions, then let's decide: cmake or autotools?

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

4. And æfter se scieppend ingelogode, he wrát "cenn", ac eala! se 
rihtendgesamnung andswarode "cenn: ne wát hú cennan 'eall'. Ástynt."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060314/6d134614/attachment.sig>