The Technical Working Group's mission statement

[R.F. Pels]

On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11.57, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:

>> Does anyone have STRONG objections? I don't want to know if you don't
>> like the syntax, or if you think buildsystem Foo would suit us better.
>> The choice has been made and it's cmake. I want to know if people object
>> the *procedure*.
>
> Please make the procedure much more transparent. I have no idea how you
> reached the decision, who has taken it, what were the reasons, and what
> consequences it will have.

I would be willing to accept cmake provided:

1) it supports distributed compilation in a reasonable way
2) it is supported by kdevelop in a reasonable way
3) the number of supported platforms stays the same
4) there is a relatively easy migration possibility from
   the automake build system to cmake.

where 1) and 2) are IMHO the critical factors in cmake adoption.

-- 
R.F. Pels,  3e Rompert 118,  5233 AL  's-Hertogenbosch,  The Netherlands
+31736414590        ruurd at tiscali.nl       http://home.tiscali.nl/~ruurd