DRAFT document on coding conventions in kde libraries

Friedrich W. H. Kossebau Friedrich.W.H at kossebau.de
Sun Mar 5 22:24:42 GMT 2006

Am Sonntag, 5. März 2006 20:42, schrieb Nicolas Goutte:
> On Sunday 05 March 2006 19:25, Frans Englich wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 March 2006 13:27, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> (...)
> > I would maintain the document in Docbook in order to keep
> > layout/structure consistent, and help with toc. One day we should keep
> > the whole of developer.kde.org in Docbook for consistency, printability,
> > maintainability, etc..
> The problem of DocBook is that we have very little people knowing DocBook
> (especially compared to HTML), so it would mean even less people writing
> texts. (Not that there is a huge mass of volunteers to write stuff for
> developer.kde.org anyway.)

Though there still(?)* is no graphical editor so you have to work with the 
textual syntax why not have oneself helped by Quanta?

Or does it have to work with vi/emacs? :P


*Andras: Could there be perhaps some VPL-mode for docbook, too?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060305/125acf8d/attachment.sig>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list