0 or 0L for empty pointers?

[Lubos Lunak]

On Friday 23 June 2006 18:17, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> On Friday 23 June 2006 17:20, André Wöbbeking wrote:
> > Any numbers on this especially with recent compilers?
>
> Apple claimed to gain 20% smaller binary and 5-10% speed-up by disabling it
> in KHTML. This was half a year ago, and they are using their Apple's branch
> of gcc.

 That seems very unlikely. Are you sure you're not confusing it with 
exceptions? RTTI should involve next to zero runtime overhead when not used 
and as it's just little data per class 20% size seems way over the top.

-- 
Lubos Lunak
KDE developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SuSE CR, s.r.o.  e-mail: l.lunak at suse.cz , l.lunak at kde.org
Drahobejlova 27  tel: +420 2 9654 2373
190 00 Praha 9   fax: +420 2 9654 2374
Czech Republic   http://www.suse.cz/