#include <QFoo>

[Allen Winter]

On Thursday 27 July 2006 17:29, Frans Englich wrote:
> On Thursday 27 July 2006 21:10, Allen Winter wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > Any reason why I shouldn't replace #include <qfoo.h> with #include <QFoo>
> > in kdelibs? (and everywhere in KDE4 source)?
> 
> That's yet another hot "taste" issue. Some would say it's not about taste, or 
> whatever.
> 
> I prefer QFoo in front of qfoo.h, because it maps directly to the class name 
> and it is what the Qt documentation uses.
> 
> Some people dislike it and see no reason for it, so I guess they would frown 
> upon gigantic commits.
> 
Ok.
I'll retreat to the safety of my bunker now.


-- 
Let's Keep the Political Talk Out of KDE PLEASE