#include <QFoo>

[Frans Englich]

On Thursday 27 July 2006 21:10, Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Any reason why I shouldn't replace #include <qfoo.h> with #include <QFoo>
> in kdelibs? (and everywhere in KDE4 source)?

That's yet another hot "taste" issue. Some would say it's not about taste, or 
whatever.

I prefer QFoo in front of qfoo.h, because it maps directly to the class name 
and it is what the Qt documentation uses.

Some people dislike it and see no reason for it, so I guess they would frown 
upon gigantic commits.


Cheers,

		Frans