Requiring qt-copy ?

[Waldo Bastian]

On Friday 27 January 2006 07:02, Olaf Jan Schmidt wrote:
> [ Thiago Macieira ]
>
> > A system that can run KDE is probably LSB 3.1-compliant, but the inverse
> > is not necessarily true.
>
> OK, that's fine.
>
> > A system implementing the bare minimum LSB Desktop compliance (= Qt
> > 4.1.0) will not be able to run KDE 4.0. KDE4 will require at least 4.2.0.
>
> Yes, that makes sense to me. KDE applications cannot be LSB-compliant
> anyway, because they need kdelibs.

This also implies that for KDE to become part of LSB, the Qt requirements of 
LSB would need to be updated first.

> As long as qt-copy is compatible with Qt 4.1 as submitted to the LSB, there
> is no problem.

Such compatibility is what one has come to expect from Qt in general.

Cheers,
Waldo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060127/98740a82/attachment.sig>