Fwd: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of KDE

Michael Pyne michael.pyne at kdemail.net
Fri Apr 7 14:58:22 BST 2006

On Friday 07 April 2006 06:03, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> On Thursday 06 April 2006 22:52, Brad Hards wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 April 2006 23:35 pm, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> > > Aaron, Dirk and myself are "on the inside"; I'm not sure why Ben posted
> > > to -devel after all. The checks so far cover libs and a bunch of its
> > > immediate dependencies (as long as we depend on qt-copy, we can check
> > > it, too :) ). A lot of filtering for false positives is needed, though.
> >
> > Can you also ask them to look at kdesupport (I'm interested mainly in
> > QCA, but I'm sure that the other libs (e.g. akode and taglib) are also of
> > interest to someone :-)
> Whatever is in kde-svnbuild gets built; if bits of kdesupport are buildable
> separately we might be able to ask for that, yes.

kdesupport is currently the second module built by default in kdesvn-build.  
So if they manage to have made it to kdelibs or kdebase before things broke 
then it is likely that they already have data on kdesupport.

 - Michael Pyne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060407/b1e4f507/attachment.sig>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list