HAL required ?

[Kevin Ottens]

Le Lundi 26 Septembre 2005 22:20, Jérôme Lodewyck a écrit :
> I think would should only rely on pkgconfig, and totally remove those ugly
> hardcoded path (see the attached configure.in.in). Do you agree ?

Of course I agree, I hate our current configure.in.in =)

I see a problem with your proposal though, you prolly ignored the 0.4.x 
support for HAL, and introduce a check against the Qt4 DBUS binding. This 
configure.in.in would be suitable for KDE 4, not for KDE 3.5, we need a fixed 
one for 3.5 only.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
"Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître,
Ne font reculer l'ignorance."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050926/55c6ba71/attachment.sig>