Fwd: Re: Switching to QtTestLib for unit tests

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Wednesday 07 September 2005 09:49, Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
> There is no guarantee that if you "make it as _simple as possible_" people
> would add test cases for their libs or use existing test cases to prove the
> correctness of their code. This has been proven time and time again.

of course not. but is this a reason to make it harder than necessary? of 
course not. unless, of course, our desire is to actively discourage people 
from writing tests in which case, yes, let's put more blockers in the way!

> AFAIC, 
> asking people to download another module once to run unit tests makes much
> more sense than duplicating the code/effort every which way...

what makes even more sense is to put it in a module everyone has and uses 
already: kdelibs.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

Full time KDE developer sponsored by Trolltech (http://www.trolltech.com)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050908/f79f6151/attachment.sig>