image viewers: a different approach
ben at meyerhome.net
Sat Oct 29 23:00:04 BST 2005
On Friday 28 October 2005 6:39 pm, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Friday 28 October 2005 12:08, Benjamin Meyer wrote:
> > Just to kill this portion of the thread here are a few apps off the
> > top of my head that want an embeded viewer for images:
> > KMail, viewing images
> Sorry for repeating what I already wrote above:
> Why should we want an embedded viewer for images in KMail? If we show
> images inline then they are simple <img> tags in the HTML code we
> create for displaying the message in the KHTMLPart. So no embedded
> viewer is needed for this.
You make no sense. You are embedding khtmlpart so embedding *is* done. In
essence khtmlpart is your image viewer.
> And if the user wants to view the picture
> then why should we use an embedded viewer instead of a fast standalone
> viewer. In fact I'd very much prefer to use an external standalone
> viewer instead of an embedded viewer because it means less code.
Because people send each other photos all the time, not having to launch
another app to view a common image formats is a feature most people expect a
mail client to do.
Public Key: http://www.icefox.net/public_key.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the kde-core-devel